Investigating the System of High-rise Moment Frame and Needs Assessment with its Cost and Time Approach

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Bachelor of Engineering and Construction Management, Payame Noor University, Karaj, Iran

Abstract
In recent decades, the need for tall towers with different uses has increased day by day. The proper performance of these towers against earthquakes is of great importance due to the volume of investments and their residents. In high-rise structures, one of the problems that makes it difficult to use the structure is the high displacement values ​​of the floors, including the roof of the structure. Therefore, in this study, by calculating the values ​​of floor and roof displacement and comparing it with the allowable structural values, the need to use new methods such as long braces, truss belts and seismic isolation system is investigated. In this paper, first, using a selected laboratory sample from the frame, how to model and validate the results of nonlinear static analysis in the SAP software is discussed. Then, by modeling the 18, 22, 26 and 30 floor samples and performing nonlinear and dynamic static analysis of nonlinear time history, the seismic performance of the system has been investigated. And their behavioral curves are presented. Finally, the results of comparing seismic parameters and displacement values ​​in different samples are presented. The results indicate poor bending system performance in high-rise structures, making it difficult to use the building normally.

Keywords

Bruce A. Bolt, Seismic input motions for nonlinear structural analysis, Journal of Earthquake
Technology ,Paper No.448, December 2004.
www.cpjournals.com ISSN:6262-155X )Civil & Project Journal)CPJ(( پروژه و عمران نشریه
عبل دٍم، دٍرُ 2 ،ؽوبرُ 4 ،تیز 1399،ؽوبرُ پیبپی 14،ففحِ 64 تب ففحِ 76
64
2. In-Kil Choi, Min Kyu Kim, Young-Sun Choun, and Jeong-Moon Seo, Shaking table test of steel
frame structures subjected to scenario earthquakes, Journal of the Nuclear Engineering and
Technology,Vol.37 No.2, April 2005.
3. K. Galal, A. Ghobarah, Effect of near-fault earthquakes on North American nuclear design spectra,
Nuclear Engineering and Design, Elsevier, February 2006.
6. Uang, C.M.; “Establishing R (or Rw) and CdFactors for Building Seismic Provisions”, Journalof
structural Engineering, ASCE, 91-82, 9119.
6. Applied Technology Council; Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Volume
8,ATC-63 Report, Redwood City, California, 8664.
4. Federal Emergency Mnagement Agency; Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic
Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA064,Washington, D.C., 6333.
6. Bathe,K.J, "Finite Element Procedure", Prentice-Hall, 8664
1. Cosenza, E., Manfredi, G. and Ramasco, R. (8660). “The Use of Damage Functionals in
Earthquake Engineering: A Comparision Between Different Methods.” Earthquke Engineering &
Structural Dynamics, Vol. 66, PP. 166-141.
6. Rodriguez, M. (8666). “A Measure of The Capacity of Earthquake Ground Motions to Damage
Structures.” Earthquke Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 60, PP. 466-460.
83. Usami, T. and Kumar, S. (8661). “Inelastic seismic design verification method for steel bridge
piers using a damage index based hysteretic model.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 63, PP. 666-
613.
88. Colombo, A. and Negro, P. (6336). “A damage index of generalised applicability.” Engineering
Structures, Vol. 66, PP. 8846-8866.
86. Cosenza, E., Manfredi, G. and Ramasco, R. (8660). “The Use of Damage Functionals in
Earthquake Engineering: A Comparision Between Different Methods.” Earthquke Engineering &
Structural Dynamics, Vol. 66, PP. 166-141.
80. Mehrabi AB. Behavior of masonry-infilled reinforced concrete frames subjected to lateral loadings
[PhD]. Boulder: University of Colorado; 8666
  • Receive Date 20 June 2020
  • Accept Date 14 July 2020
  • First Publish Date 14 July 2020
  • Publish Date 21 June 2020