Prioritization of Asphalt Pavement Distresses through Road Users’ Perceptions: An Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Case Study in Gonabad

Haghighat, Ali; Jalal Kamali, Mohammad Hossain

doi:10.22034/cpj.2025.553949.1409

Prioritization of Asphalt Pavement Distresses through Road Users’ Perceptions: An Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Case Study in Gonabad

https://doi.org/10.22034/cpj.2025.553949.1409

Volume 7, Issue 11 - Serial Number 81
February 2026

Pages 11-23

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Ali Haghighat ¹

Mohammad Hossain Jalal Kamali ²

¹ B.Sc. Student in Civil Engineering, University of Gonabad, Gonabad, Iran.

² University of Gonabad

Abstract

Optimal pavement maintenance, under limited resources, requires a scientific and precise prioritization of pavement distress. Traditional approaches have predominantly focused on technical and structural criteria, often overlooking the perspective of road users who interact daily with the quality of urban pavements. This study aims to bridge this analytical gap by introducing a novel approach centered on the road users’ perceptions to prioritize asphalt pavement distresses in the city of Gonabad using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). In this research, five principal streets in Gonabad, each representing a dominant distress type (severe raveling, alligator cracking, potholes, longitudinal cracks, and transverse cracks), were selected. An online questionnaire based on pairwise comparisons was designed, through which respondents evaluated and compared the driving quality and experience along these corridors. The collected qualitative assessments were converted into quantitative values using Saaty’s 1-9 scale. After verifying the consistency ratio, the final pairwise comparison matrix was constructed using the geometric mean of the valid responses. Subsequently, the final weights and maintenance priorities for each distress type were calculated using Expert Choice 11 software. The results revealed that, from the perspective of road users in Gonabad, severe raveling ranked first in maintenance priority with the highest relative weight (approximately 38%), followed by alligator cracking (about 25%) and potholes (about 21%). Longitudinal and transverse cracks received lower relative importance and were placed in subsequent priorities. Emphasizing the integration of users’ perceptions into the managerial decision-making process represents an innovative approach to urban pavement evaluation and provides insights for developing maintenance strategies that enhance both user satisfaction and surface performance.

Keywords

Pavement Management System

Asphalt Pavement Distresses

Distress Prioritization

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Road users&‌‌‌‌‌rsquo

Perception

Subjects

مهندسی عمران-راه و ترابری

Ahmed, S., Vedagiri, P., & Rao, K. K. (2017). Prioritization of pavement maintenance sections using
objective based Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Pavement Research and
Technology, 10(2), 158-170.
Burningham, S., & Stankevich, N. (2005). Why road maintenance is important and how to get it done.
Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys.
Forman, E., & Peniwati, K. (1998). Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic
hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 108(1), 165-169.
Ghobeishavi, M. (2022). Investigation of types and causes of breakdowns and cracks in asphalt roads in
Bandar Mahshahr city in Khuzestan province.
Hasan, A. E., & Jaber, F. K. (2023). The applicability of multiple MCDM techniques for implementation
in the priority of road maintenance. Journal of Engineering, 29(10), 106-125.
International, A. (2018). Standard practice for roads and parking lots pavement condition index surveys.
ASTM International.
Jalal Kamali, M. H., Hassani, A., & Sodagari, J. (2020). Investigating the relation among British
pendulum number, mean texture depth and asphalt content in hot mix asphalt. Journal of
Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, 8(1), 87-96.
Li, H., Ni, F., Dong, Q., & Zhu, Y. (2018). Application of analytic hierarchy process in network level
pavement maintenance decision-making. International Journal of Pavement Research and
Technology, 11(4), 345-354.
Mahmood, M. S. (2015). Network-level maintenance decisions for flexible pavement using a soft
computing-based framework. Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom).
Nandar Tun, K. K., Moe Thet Thet Aye. (2024). An Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach to
Road Maintenance Prioritization: A Case Study in Shan State, Myanmar. Innovation in
Engineering, 1, 60-72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58712/ie.v1i2.9
Nugraha, M. A., Muhidong, J., & Soma, A. (2025). MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING IN
ROAD MAINTENANCE: AN AHP-GIS APPROACH. International Journal of the Analytic
Hierarchy Process, 17(3).
Ragnoli, A., De Blasiis, M. R., & Di Benedetto, A. (2018). Pavement distress detection methods: A
review. Infrastructures, 3(4), 58.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of
services sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
Sepahvand, S. (2013). standardization and safety improvement in the road tunnels Shahid Chamran
University of Ahvaz]. Ahvaz, Iran.
Sepahvand, S., Hejazi, S. J., & Jalal Kamali, M. H. (2025). Advancing Tunnel Safety Management: A
Simple and Adaptable Method for Comprehensive Evaluation. Contributions of Science and
Technology for Engineering, -. https://doi.org/10.22080/cste.2025.29635.1066
Shah, Y. U., Jain, S., & Parida, M. (2014). Evaluation of prioritization methods for effective pavement
maintenance of urban roads. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15(3), 238-250.
Touahmia, M. (2017). Prediction of pavement condition based on public perceptions. INTERNATIONAL
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 4(8), 129-132.

XML

PDF 1.24 M