اعتبار،چابکی،پاسخگویی

کاربرد مدلسازی اطلاعات ساختمان (BIM) در ارزیابی و مقایسه میزان کربن نهفته در بازسازی ساختمان های آموزشی با مصالح ساختمانی مختلف

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی و مدیریت ساخت، گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی (ره)، قزوین، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی (ره)، قزوین، ایران

3 دانشیار، دانشکده طراحی و محیط ساخته شده، دانشگاه کانبرا، کانبرا، استرالیا

چکیده
‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬ امروزه جامعه جهانی با دو پدیده اساسی گرمایش زمین و تغییرات اقلیمی که در پی انتشار گازهای گلخانه‌ای رخ می‌دهند روبروست. بررسی‌ها نشان می‌دهد که ساختمان‌ها و صنعت ساخت سهم عمده‌ای در ایجاد این شرایط دارند. لذا مخاطرات ناشی از این شرایط، موجب تاکید بر طراحی‌ها و برنامه‌ریزی‌های مختلف برای دستیابی به ساختمان‌های سازگار با محیط زیست و مطابق با اصول پایداری شده‌است. در همین راستا، مطالعه حاضر با هدف ارزیابی و مقایسه میزان کربن نهفته مصالح انتخابی در هنگام بازسازی و ترمیم ساختمان‌های آموزشی برمبنای یکپارچگی فناوری مدلسازی اطلاعات ساختمان و توسعه پایدار انجام شده‌است. در این پژوهش با بکارگیری فناوری مدلسازی اطلاعات ساختمان، یک ساختمان آموزشی در نرم افزار رویت شبیه‌سازی شده و سپس با استخراج ابعاد و مقادیر مصالح استفاده شده برای مدل‌های پیشنهادی با مصالح ساختمانی مختلف، هزینه هر یک از مدل‌ها و همینطور میزان انتشار کربن نهفته در آنها آنالیز و مقایسه شده‌اند. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که در حالت کلی در مقایسه با مدل بازسازی شده با مصالح یکسان با مدل موجود، بازسازی با مصالح متداول 08/15 درصد، بازسازی با مصالح مدرن 71/35 درصد و بازسازی با مصالح سنتی 49/82 درصد کربن نهفته کمتر ایجاد خواهد کرد. در نتیجه در بازسازی با استفاده از مصالح سنتی کاهش قابل توجهی در میزان کربن نهفته یک ساختمان پدید می‌آید و این شیوه از بازسازی از نظر شاخص‌های زیست‌محیطی توسعه پایدار و همچنین صرفه‌جویی در هزینه، مناسب‌ترین شیوه برای بازسازی ساختمان مورد مطالعه با کاربری آموزشی می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Building Information Modelling (BIM) application in evaluating and comparing the amount of embodied carbon in the retrofitting of educational buildings with different building materials

نویسندگان English

Zahra Movaghar 1
Roohollah Taherkhani 2
Saeed Banihashemi 3
1 M.Sc. of Engineering & Construction Management, Department of Civil Engineering, Imam Khomeini International University (IKIU), Qazvin, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Imam Khomeini International University (IKIU), Qazvin, Iran
3 Asociate Professor, School of Design & Built Environment, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
چکیده English

Today, the global community is facing two fundamental phenomena: global warming and climate change, both of which result from greenhouse gas emissions. Studies show that buildings and the construction industry play a major role in creating these conditions. Therefore, the risks arising from these conditions have led to an emphasis on designing and planning to achieve environmentally friendly buildings that adhere to sustainability principles. In this context, the present study aims to assess and compare the embodied carbon of selected materials during the retrofitting and rehabilitation of educational buildings based on the integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) technology and sustainable development. In this research, using BIM technology, an educational building was simulated in Revit software. By extracting the dimensions and quantities of materials used for proposed models with different construction materials, the cost of each model and the amount of embodied carbon emissions were analyzed and compared. The results indicate that, in general, compared to the model retrofitted with the same materials as the existing model, retrofitting with conventional materials results in 15.08% less embodied carbon, retrofitting with modern materials results in 35.71% less embodied carbon, and retrofitting with traditional materials results in 82.49% less embodied carbon. Therefore, retrofitting using traditional materials significantly reduces the embodied carbon of a building. This method of retrofitting, in terms of sustainable development environmental indicators and cost savings, is the most suitable method for the studied building with an educational function.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Sustainable Construction
  • Building Information Modelling (BIM)
  • Embodied Carbon
  • Building Material
  • Retrofitting
  • Educational Buildings
Abanda, F H, A H Oti, and J H M Tah. 2017. “Integrating BIM and New Rules of Measurement for
Embodied Energy and CO2 Assessment.” Journal of Building Engineering 12: 288–305.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710216302571.
Aram, K, and R Taherkhani. 2022. “An Optimized Solution for Tackling Effects of Climate Change
on an Educational Building Based on Net Zero Energy Technique.” Journal of Engineering &
Construction Management (JECM) 7(1): 8–15.
Azhar, Salman, and Justin Brown. 2009. “BIM for Sustainability Analyses.” International Journal of
Construction Education and Research 5(4): 276–92.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15578770903355657.
Bowyer, Jim. 2013. Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Non-Residential Buildings. Dovetail Partners.
Cang, Yujie, Liu Yang, Zhixing Luo, and Nan Zhang. 2020. “Prediction of Embodied Carbon
Emissions from Residential Buildings with Different Structural Forms.” Sustainable Cities and
Society 54: 101946. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670719310819.
Cavalliere, Carmine, Guillaume Habert, Guido Raffaele Dell’Osso, and Alexander Hollberg. 2019.
“Continuous BIM-Based Assessment of Embodied Environmental Impacts throughout the
Design Process.” Journal of Cleaner Production 211: 941–52.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652618336485.
Chong, Heap-Yih, and Xiangyu Wang. 2016. “The Outlook of Building Information Modeling for
Sustainable Development.” Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 18(6): 1877–87.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1170-7.
Crippa, Julianna et al. 2018. “A BIM–LCA Integration Technique to Embodied Carbon Estimation
Applied on Wall Systems in Brazil.” Built Environment Project and Asset Management 8(5):
491–503. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-10-2017-0093.
Fani, Farzad, and Roohollah Taherkhani. 2018. “Four-Dimensional Building Information Modeling
(4D BIM) in Construction Project Management (in Farsi).” Journal of Engineering and
Construction Management (JECM) 3(2): 1–6.
Fazeli, Abdulwahed, Farzad Jalaei, Mostafa Khanzadi, and Saeed Banihashemi. 2022. “BIMIntegrated
TOPSIS-Fuzzy Framework to Optimize Selection of Sustainable Building
Components.” International Journal of Construction Management 22(7): 1240–59.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1686836.
Fenner, Andriel Evandro et al. 2020. “Embodied, Operation, and Commuting Emissions: A Case
Study Comparing the Carbon Hotspots of an Educational Building.” Journal of Cleaner
Production 268: 122081.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620321284.
Gan, Vincent J L et al. 2017. “Sustainability Analyses of Embodied Carbon and Construction Cost in
High-Rise Buildings Using Different Materials and Structural Forms.” HKIE Transactions 24(4):
216–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1023697X.2017.1375436.
———. 2018. “Holistic BIM Framework for Sustainable Low Carbon Design of High-Rise
Buildings.” Journal of Cleaner Production 195: 1091–1104.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652618316251.
Jalaei, F, and A Jrade. 2015. “Integrating Building Information Modeling (BIM) and LEED System at
the Conceptual Design Stage of Sustainable Buildings.” Sustainable Cities and Society 18: 95–
107.
Kayaçetin, N C, and A M Tanyer. 2020. “Embodied Carbon Assessment of Residential Housing at
Urban Scale.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 117: 109470.
Muller, Marina Figueiredo et al. 2019. “A Systematic Literature Review of Interoperability in the
Green Building Information Modeling Lifecycle.” Journal of Cleaner Production 223: 397–412.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619308054.
Nizam, Raja Shahmir, Cheng Zhang, and Lu Tian. 2018. “A BIM Based Tool for Assessing Embodied
Energy for Buildings.” Energy and Buildings 170: 1–14.
34 /موقر, زهرا, طاهرخانی, روح اله, & بنی هاشمی, سعید. -11 ،)5(6 ، نشریه عمران و پروژه، 1403
34
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778817325719.
Ortiz, Oscar., Francesc. Castellsa, and Guido. Sonnemannc. 2009. “Sustainability in the Construction
Industry: A Review of Recent Developments Based on LCA.” Construction and Building
Materials 23: 28–39.
P Rode, R Burdett, JC Soares Gonçalves. 2011. “Buildings: Investing in Energy and Resource
Efficiency.” In Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty
Eradication, , 331–73.
Pomponi, Francesco, and Alice Moncaster. 2018. “Scrutinising Embodied Carbon in Buildings: The
next Performance Gap Made Manifest.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 81: 2431–
42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211730998X.
Puskas, Attila, and Ligia Moga. 2015. “Sustainability of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures - A
Case Study.” International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning 10: 165–76.
Rahim, FA et al. 2014. “Sustainable Construction through Life Cycle Costing.” Journal of building
performance 5(1).
Raza, Muhammad Saleem, Bassam A Tayeh, Yazan I Abu Aisheh, and Ahmed M Maglad. 2023.
“Potential Features of Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Application of Project
Management Knowledge Areas in the Construction Industry.” Heliyon 9(9): e19697.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023069050.
Resch, Eirik, Carine Lausselet, Helge Brattebø, and Inger Andresen. 2020. “An Analytical Method for
Evaluating and Visualizing Embodied Carbon Emissions of Buildings.” Building and
Environment 168: 106476.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132319306882.
Schlueter, Arno, and Frank Thesseling. 2009. “Building Information Model Based Energy/Exergy
Performance Assessment in Early Design Stages.” Automation in Construction 18(2): 153–63.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580508001064.
Taherkhani, R., M. Alviri, P. Panahi, and N. Hashempour. 2023. “Low Embodied Carbon and Energy
Materials in Building Systems: A Case Study of Reinforcing Clay Houses in Desert Regions.”
International Journal of Engineering 36(8): 1409–28.
Taherkhani, Roohollah. 2022. “An Integrated Social Sustainability Assessment Framework: The Case
of Construction Industry.” Open House International 48(2): 206–36.
Taherkhani, Roohollah. 2023. “Barriers to Green Building Implementation in Developing Countries:
The Case of Iran.” Environment, Development and Sustainability.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03816-7.
Taherkhani, Roohollah., Saaed. Shaahnazari, Najme. Hashempour, and Faezeh. Taherkhani. 2022.
“Sustainable Cities through the Right Selection of Vegetation Types for Green Roofs.”
International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development 13(3): 365–
88.
Taherkhani, Roohollah. 2013. “Development of a Social Sustainability Model in Industrial Building
System.” Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia.
Taherkhani, Roohollah, and A.L. Saleh. 2019. “Awareness and Prevalence of Industrialized Building
System (IBS) in Iran.” Jurnal Teknologi 81(6): 13–23.
https://journals.utm.my/jurnalteknologi/article/view/13364.
De Wolf, Catherine et al. 2015. “Material Quantities and Embodied Carbon Dioxide in Structures.”
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability 0(0): null.
https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.15.00033.
Zandiye, Keyvan, Roohollah Taherkhani, and Reza Ziaie Moayed. 2016. “History of Safety in Iranian
Construction Industry (in Farsi).” Journal of Engineering and Construction Management
(JECM) 1(1): 13–20.
Zhu, Weina, Wei Feng, Xiaodong Li, and Zhihui Zhang. 2020. “Analysis of the Embodied Carbon
Dioxide in the Building Sector: A Case of China.” Journal of Cleaner Production 269: 122438.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620324859.
  • تاریخ دریافت 03 اردیبهشت 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 31 اردیبهشت 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 03 خرداد 1403
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 03 خرداد 1403
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 مرداد 1403