اعتبار،چابکی،پاسخگویی

سنجش کارائی فعلی و راهکار ارتقاء کارآمدی آتی مرحله امکان سنجی در پروژه های ساختمانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترا مدیریت ساخت دانشکده فنی و مهندسی دانشگاه آزاد تهران مرکزی

2 استادیار و عضو هیات علمی دانشکده فنی و مهندسی دانشگاه آزاد تهران مرکزی

3 استاد و عضو هیات علمی دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران و دانشگاه آزاد

چکیده
علیرغم توجه به توسعه نظریه های مربوط به مراحل آغازین چرخه حیات پروژه ( مطالعات امکان سنجی و برنامه ریزی های اولیه ) ، هنوز کاملا مشخص و روشن نیست که ذینفعان و دست اندرکاران پروژه تا چه حد در مورد ضرورت و چگونگی پیاده سازی این مراحل در عمل اعتقاد دارند . این تحقیق با هدف سنجش میزان کارائی پیاده سازی این مرحله در پروژه های ساختمانی (خصوصا در کشور ایران)وپیشنهاد راهکار ارتقاء کارآمدی آن انجام شده است . ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات، پرسشنامه محور بوده و با استفاده از شاخص اهمیت نسبی موارد ذیل مورد سنجش، تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفته است: (1)سنجش کارایی روشهای موجود امکان سنجی؛ (2) توسعه وکنترل عملکرد آن؛ و (3)امکان سنجی دانش محور. در نتیجه این آنالیز ، فاکتورهایی راکه برای توسعه مرحله آغازین پروژه از اهمیت ویژه ای برخوردار هستند ( توالی فعالیت ها،مدیریت پایین به بالاوساختار شکست کار مناسب) آشکار ساخت. و یافته های کلی حاکی از این است که این تحقیق می تواند برای روشن کردن چگونگی تقویت پیوند بین تئوری های مرتبط و استفاده این نظریه ها در اجرای پروژه ها در عمل کاربرد داشته باشد. علاوه بر این، تحقیق حاضر می تواند بینش جدیدی را برای مدیران و دست اندرکاران پروژه ها به سمت استراتژی ها و ابزارهای جدید مدیریتی دانش محور مورد نیاز و پیاده سازی سیستم آموزش تیم پروژه برای ارتقاء سطح بینش و درک ذینفعان پروژه از مراحل آغازین چرخه عمر پروژه در شیوه های فعلی پروژه های ساختمانی فراهم نماید .

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Measuring Current Efficiency and Strategy for Improving Future Efficiency of Feasibility Phase in Construction Projects

نویسندگان English

Alireza Solhjoo 1
Towhid Pourrostam, 2
Mohsen Vafamehr 3
Javad Majrouhi Sardroud, 2
1 PhD Candidate Construction Management Azad University-Tehran Central Branch
2 Assistant Professor, Engineering & Technical Faculty, Azad University Central Tehran Branch,
3 Professor, School of Architecture and environmental Design, Iran University of Science & Technology
چکیده English

In spite of the development of theories related to the early stages of the project life cycle (feasibility studies and initial planning), it is still unclear to what extent the project stakeholders have sufficient belief regarding the necessity and implementation of these initiation phases in practice. This research has been conducted with the aim of measuring the efficiency of implementation of feasibility study in construction projects (especially in Iran) and proposing a solution to improve its efficiency in the future. The data collection tool is questionnaire based and has been measured and analyzed using the relative importance index (RII) of the following items: Measuring the efficiency of existing feasibility methods, Developing and controlling its performance and Knowledge-based feasibility study. The results of this analysis revealed the factors such as (Sequence of tasks, bottom-up management and appropriate work breakdown structure) that are of particular importance for the development of the initial phase of projects. Also, the general findings indicate that this research can be used to clarify how to strengthen the link between related theories and the use of these theories in the implementation of projects in practice. In addition, this research can provide new insights for project managers and stakeholders towards the new knowledge-based management strategies and tools and also can implement the project team training system to improve the level of insight and understanding of project stakeholders from the early stages of the life cycle in the current practices of construction projects.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Construction project management
  • Project life-cycle
  • feasibility study
  • initiate planning
  • project stakeholders
Ahuja, V., & Thiruvengadam, V. (2114). Project scheduling and monitoring: Current research status. Construction
Innovation: Information, Process, Management.
Alsakini, W., Wikström, K., & Kiiras, J. (2114). Proactive schedule management of industrial turnkey projects in
developing countries. International Journal of Project Management.
Andersen, E. S. (2114). Activity planning is hazardous to your project’s health! International Journal of Project
Management.
www.cpjournals.com ISSN:6262-155X )Civil & Project Journal)CPJ(( نشریه عمران و پروژه
ػب ػٛ ،ْ دٚسٜ 3، ؿ بٕسٜ 9، آرس 1400 ،ؿ بٕسٜ پیبپی 31 ،کفحٝ 102 تب کفحٝ 122
212
Antill, J. M., & Woodhead, R. W. (2112). Critical path methods in construction practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY:
Wiley- Interscience.
Cegarra, J., & Wezel, W. (2115). A comparison of task analysis methods for planning and scheduling. In C. F. Jan,
W. Toni, & W. John (Eds.), Behavioral operations in planning and scheduling.
Chan, D. W., & Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2115). A comparative study of causes of time overruns in Hong Kong
construction projects. International Journal of Project Management.
Chen, S.-M., Griffis, F. H., Chen, P.-H., & Chang, L.-M. (2112). Simulation and analytical techniques for
construction resource planning and scheduling. Automation in Construction.
Christian, J. (2112). Risk assessment in constructionschedules. Journal of Construction Engineeringand
Management.
Chua, D. K., & Godinot, M. (2116). Use of a WBS matrix to improve interface management in projects. Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management.
De Snoo, C., Van Wezel, W., & Jorna, R. J. (2116). An empirical investigation of scheduling performance criteria.
Journal of Operations Management.
Glenwright, E., & Mattos, A. D. (2112). The case for construction schedule validation and auditing. AACE
International Transactions.
Greenwood, D. J. (2112).An efficient method construction projects with resource constraints. International Journal
of Project Management.
Haugan, G. T. (2112). Project planning and scheduling. Leesburg Pike, VA: Management Concepts Press.
Herroelen, W., & Leus, R. (2116). On the merits and pitfalls of critical chain scheduling. Journal of Operations
Management.
Holt, G. D. (2114). Asking questions, analysing answers: Relative importance revisited. Construction Innovation:
Information, Process, Management.
Huang, J. W., & Wang, X. X. (2116). Risk analysis of construction schedule based on PERT and MC simulation.
In 2116 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial
Engineering.
James, T. (2112). A comparison of email and postal surveys. The Irish Journal of Psychology.
Kelsey, J. (2115). What do construction projectplanners do? International Journal of Project Management.
Kelsey, J. M., Winch, G. M., & Penn, A. (2115). Understanding the project planning process.
Kerzner, H. (2112). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling.
Kuklan, H., Erdem, E., Nasri, F., & Paknejad, M. J. (2112).Project planning and control: An enhanced PERT
network.International Journal of Project Management.
Kumar, P. P. (2115). Effective use of Gantt chart for managinglarge scale projects.
Laslo, Z. (2111). Project portfolio management: An integratedmethod for resource planning and scheduling to
minimizeplanning/scheduling-dependent expenses. InternationalJournal of Project Management.
Leach, L. P. (2112). Buffers: Key to project schedule success.
Lim, A., Ma, H., Rodrigues, B., Teck Tan, S., & Xiao, F. (2111).New concepts for activity float in resourceconstrained
projectmanagement.
Liu, S.-S., & Wang, C.-J. (2112). Optimizing linear project schedulingwith multi-skilled crews. Automation in
Construction.
Long, L. D., & Ohsato, A. (2112). Fuzzy critical chain methodfor project scheduling under resource constraints
anduncertainty. International Journal of Project Management.
Luu, V. T., Kim, S. Y., Tuan, N. V., & Ogunlana, S. O. (2112).Quantifying schedule risk in construction projects
usingBayesian belief networks. International Journal of ProjectManagement.
Maylor, H. (2112). Beyond the Gantt chart: Project managementmoving on. European Management Journal.
McKay, K. N., & Wiers, V. (2111). Unifying the theory andpractice of production scheduling. Journal of
ManufacturingSystems.
Oberlender, G. D. (2115). Project management for engineeringand construction.
Olawale, Y., & Sun, M. (2115). Construction project control inthe UK: Current practice, existing problems and
recommendationsfor future improvement. International Journalof Project Management.
Oppenheim, A. N. (2113). Questionnaire design, interviewing andattitude measurement. London, UK.
Plotnick, F. (2121). CPM in constructionmanagement. New York: McGraw-HillProfessional.
Rand, G. (2121). Critical chain: The theory of constraintsapplied to project management. International Journal
ofProject Management.
Rasdorf, W., & Abudayyeh, O. (2112). Cost‐ and schedule‐ controlintegration: Issues and needs. Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management.
www.cpjournals.com ISSN:6262-155X )Civil & Project Journal)CPJ(( نشریه عمران و پروژه
ػب ػٛ ،ْ دٚسٜ 3، ؿ بٕسٜ 9، آرس 1400 ،ؿ بٕسٜ پیبپی 31 ،کفحٝ 102 تب کفحٝ 122
211
Rowley, J. (2114). Designing and using research questionnaires.Management Research Review.
Saver, J. (2112). Knowledge-based design of scheduling systems.Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing.
Shobrys, D. E., & White, D. C. (2112). Planning, scheduling andcontrol systems, Computers& Chemical
Engineering.
Tam, V. W. Y., Shen, L. Y., & Kong, J. S. Y. (2116). Impacts ofmulti-layer chain subcontracting on project
managementperformance. International Journal of Project Management.
Walker, D. H. T., & Shen, Y. J. (2112). Project understanding, planning, flexibility of management action and
constructiontime performance.
Weaver, P. (2121). Scheduling in the age of complexity. Paperpresented at the Sixth Annual PMI College of
SchedulingConference.
Wilkins, D. E. (2115). A call for knowledge-based planning. AIMagazine.
Wilson, J. M. (2113). Gantt charts: A centenary appreciation.European Journal of Operational Research.
Yang, J. B. (2115). Comparison of CPM and CCS tools to constructionproject. Proceedings of Third International
StructuralEngineering and Construction Conference.
  • تاریخ دریافت 03 تیر 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش 15 مرداد 1400
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 01 آذر 1400
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 آذر 1400